Session Information
ASHE 2013 Summit & Exhibition on Health Facility Planning, Design & Construction
Click here to go to the previous page
Non-Traditional Project Delivery Models at UCSF Medical Center
Track : Fundamentals of PDC
Program Code: 308888
Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Time: 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM  EST
Location: Rm 2022-24
PRIMARY SPEAKER :   Click the plus sign to see more detailed information about each speaker.
 Alan Laurlund, CHC, LEED AP BD+C, Vice President, XL Construction
CO-SPEAKER (S):
Mr. Scott Sypult, Construction Manager, CBRE Project Management at UCSF Medical Center
 Kevin Ng, Project Manager, XL Construction
 Katy Merwin, Director, Project Management Services, UCSF Medical Center, Office of Design and Construction
Description
The increasingly complex, technical, and risky nature of health care construction projects has led to an increased need for a collaborative team approach to construction and preconstruction to ensure project success. This session will examine new non-traditional delivery models implemented by the UCSF Design and Construction team, and consider both the pros and cons of each delivery model. The presentation will feature a panel of participants in the IMRIS intra-operative MRI project, which was executed utilizing a non-traditional delivery method. This session will enable attendees to:

Identify new and non-traditional project procurement and delivery methods being utilized by UCSF for their most difficult and challenging projects.
Cite the positive and negative aspects of these delivery methods from the perspective of UCSF’s Design and Construction team (owner’s perspective).
Cite the positive and negative aspects of these delivery methods from the perspective of UCSF’s contracts and legal teams
Describe the benefits to construction, compliance, and project cost that are achieved by these delivery methods.

LEARNER OUTCOMES:
  • What are the benefits to construction, compliance, and project cost that are achieved by these delivery methods?
  • What are the positive and negative aspects of these delivery methods from the perspective of UCSFs contracts and legal teams?
  • What are the positive and negative aspects of these delivery methods from the perspective of UCSFs Design and Construction team (owners perspective)?
  • What new and non-traditional project procurement and delivery methods are being utilized by UCSF for their most difficult and challenging projects?