Session Information
ASHE 2011 International Conference and Exhibition on Health Facility Planning Design and Construction
Click here to go to the previous page
Replace-in-Place: Is It an Oxymoron for Planning a 21st-Century Health Care Facility?
Track
:
Governance and Oversight of the PDC Process
Program Code:
226818
Date:
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Time:
7:30 AM to 8:30 AM
EST
Location:
TCC - Room 15-16
PRIMARY SPEAKER
:
Click the plus sign to see more detailed information
about each speaker.
Click the plus sign to see more detailed information
about each speaker.
Robert Siebenaller, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C, ACHE, Healthcare Division Manager/Senior Associate, SSOE Group
CO-PRESENTER
(S):
Click the plus sign to see more detailed information
about each speaker.
Click the plus sign to see more detailed information
about each speaker.
Description
Responding to the community's request for its hospital to remain in downtown Bryan, Ohio, the design team faced a challenge-to design a new hospital that could deliver 21st-century technology and quality as a replace-in-place facility. By relying on the design and construction team's ability to implement phasing, the owners were able to deliver a hospital that supports the needs of the community while concurrently demonstrating good stewardship and a commitment to sustainability. This session will enable you to-
• Develop a tool a project team cam use, based on the case study, to determine if replacing a health care facility in place is an effective, realistic option for a project.
• Compare and contrast, based on the case study, the challenges and benefits of using phasing to construct a facility (the replace-in-place approach) in terms of community satisfaction and support.
• Discuss strategies, as shown in the case study, for gaining support from senior staff for a replace-in-place approach to replacing a health care facility.
• Develop an effective process, using information from the case study, to achieve community support for rebuilding a health care facility in place that meets local needs and supports high-quality patient care.
• Develop a tool a project team cam use, based on the case study, to determine if replacing a health care facility in place is an effective, realistic option for a project.
• Compare and contrast, based on the case study, the challenges and benefits of using phasing to construct a facility (the replace-in-place approach) in terms of community satisfaction and support.
• Discuss strategies, as shown in the case study, for gaining support from senior staff for a replace-in-place approach to replacing a health care facility.
• Develop an effective process, using information from the case study, to achieve community support for rebuilding a health care facility in place that meets local needs and supports high-quality patient care.
LEARNER OUTCOMES:
- Learn how the obstacles and opportunities encountered throughout the project were addressed by the team to keep the project moving forward.
- Learn the limitations of Design Phasing vs. Construction Phasing.
- Understand the complexity of Replace-in-Place versus Greenfield development and how a Phasing Plan can be used to analyze a project.
- Understand the role of the Owner to facilitate planning and construction operations.
Audio Synchronized to PowerPoint
(Code: 226818)
This session is a part of:
This session is a part of: