PRIMARY SPEAKER
(S):
CO-PRESENTER
(S):
Click the plus sign to see more detailed information
about each speaker.
David Allison,
AIA, ACHA, Professor /Director of Graduate Studies in Architecture + Health,
Clemson Univesrity
David Allison, AIA, ACHA: David Allison AIA, ACHA is a Professor of Architecture and the Director of Graduate Studies in Architecture + Health at Clemson University, the most structured and established professional [M.Arch] degree programs in the nation with a concentration in Architecture and Health. The A+H program at Clemson is nationally recognized for the quality of its curriculum and consistent emphasis on design excellence within the discipline of healthcare architecture. It is focused on preparing architectural graduates to engage in the integrated planning and design of health care facilities, the healthful design of communities, and the healthful design of the built environment in general. The A+H program is also committed to the integration of innovative design with academic scholarship and research in healthcare environments.
Professor Allison is a registered architect in California, South Carolina, North Carolina, and is NCARB certified. He is the interim and founding director of a new Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing based in South Carolina which is committed to conducting research on new design concepts for patient care settings. He speaks and writes on issues related to the healthful design of healthcare facilities and other architectural settings and has served on numerous national design award juries. He was a founding member of the American College of Healthcare Architects and the Coalition for Health Environments Research. He is currently a member of the Center for Healthcare Design Research Advisory Council, and the Health Environments Research and Design Journal Editorial Review Board. He also serves on the Leadership Council of the AIA Academy of Architecture for Health where he also served a three year term as a AIA/AAH National Advisory Board member. He was identified in 2008 as one of "Twenty Making a Difference" nationally by Healthcare Design Magazine.
|
|
Greg Mare has over three decades of experience as an innovator and expert in healthcare planning and design. As Principal-In-Charge and lead medical planner for new freestanding childrens hospitals, hospital additions and alterations, for academic healthcare systems and childrens hospitals within a hospital, Mr. Mare brings significant project knowledge to the Anshen+Allen team. He is an industry leader in evidence-based design and patient quality/safety environments, and a prolific national speaker on pediatric healthcare design issues. Greg has been named to Healthcare Design Magazines Twenty Who Are Making a Difference published in the December 2008 issue.
|
Description
This session will present, compare and critically examine the design issues, strategies and features of two distinct patient room concepts being employed in recently completed healthcare facilities: The Clemson University [CU]/ Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System [SRHS] Patient Room Prototype and the same-handed room design at Dublin Methodist Hospital. It will also present preliminary findings of research studies being conducted on these room designs and engage participants in the identification of additional research studies that could be conducted on these two room designs that would be useful to design professionals, clinicians and hospital decision makers. Finally, the panel will engage participants in discussion on the translation of research findings into design principals and strategies that can be more broadly applied in the design of private patient rooms for acute care and acuity adaptable needs.
Each of the patient room designs represents distinct design concepts and features. The Clemson University/Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System Patient Room Prototype involves mirror image rooms with inboard headwall toilets designed to optimize sight lines into the room from the corridor and optimize access for patients and staff without compromising the exterior wall or family zone in the room. It also features a unique headwall and footwall design. The patient room at Dublin Methodist features a same-handed design concept where each room is organized in standardized and consistent arrangement. Both rooms were designed to optimize clinical performance, health outcomes, patient and staff satisfaction, and patient/staff safety yet represent a distinct approach toward achieving these goals.
The presentation will also cover the design-research process employed in the design development and evaluation of each room concept, as well as report on preliminary research studies conducted on each room. The CU/SRHS Patient Room Prototype room was developed in a collaborative interdisciplinary design-research process involving multiple disciplines from two Universities, SRHS, Industry advisors and multiple design professionals. It ran in parallel with a design process for SRHSs new Village at Pelham Hospital. The Dublin Methodist Hospital was conducted as a Center for Health Design Pebble Project involving both the design team and hospital before, during and after design and occupancy.
The intent of the session is to present, compare and examine two distinct room designs in terms of specific performance measures, and examine the research methods and insights gained from each design and research approach. The session will cover challenges and barriers to optimizing design performance and integrating design and research. Further, panelists will seek input from participants on how to improve research on patient room design, how to translate research into usable design recommendations and lessons learned for improved patient room design in the future.
LEARNER OUTCOMES:
-
(1) Understand detailed design and research issues surrounding patient room design
-
(2) Understand the similarities and differences of two distinct patient room design concepts
-
(3) Learn how selected design features affect performance outcomes such as satisfaction, safety, efficiency and quality of care.
-
(4) Understand how to integrate design and research and translate research findings