MODERATOR
:
SPEAKER
:
Patrick Ooley, MS, MT(ASCP), CQA(ASQ)CMQ/OE, Corporate Director Quality, Blood Systems, Inc.
Should Employee Progressive Discipline, Deviation Management and Accountability be Linked?
Description
Deviation management is a vital component of organizational quality improvement and compliance. While the discovery and reporting of errors has a primary goal to improve processes, very often management chooses to point the finger at the employee. Should deviation management be linked to employee discipline? Robust deviation management approaches evaluate both processes and staff involved in a deviation. Determining thresholds or steps to distinguish between improvement actions vs. employee actions (discipline) is an ongoing challenge. This workshop will explore methods to link process and error investigations to employee involvement. A process will be shared that will provide suggestions on how and when employee progressive discipline may be appropriate. Personal and organizational accountability concepts will also be discussed.
-
Develop a model policy on how errors can be linked to progressive discipline.
-
Discuss how deviations or errors relate to employee progressive discipline
-
Outline methods to distinguish between steps for improving a process vs. enacting steps for progressive discipline in response to an error.
-
Tie deviation management to individual and organizational accountability.
CE Category | CE Value |
---|
California Clinical Laboratory Personnel |
1.5 |
California Nurse |
1.8 |
Florida Laboratory Personnel |
1.8 |
General Attendee |
1.5 |
Physician |
1.5 |
Please note: Continuing education (CE) credit is available for online offerings only. Individuals that purchase CD-ROMs will not receive CE credit for the programs they view.